Creative License: The Law and Culture of Digital Sampling

Copyright and Trademark and Intellectual Property

Article Snapshot

Author(s)

Peter DiCola and Kembrew McLeod

Source

Duke University Press, 2011

Summary

Digital sampling is the art of combining excerpts from existing music recordings to make new music. Musicians must navigate a cumbersome licensing process to obtain permission to use samples. Classic hip-hop recordings made in the 1980s could no longer be made today.

Policy Relevance

Licensing tiny samples of music should not violate copyright law. The process for licensing samples should be reformed.

Main Points

  • The golden age of digital sampling began in the 1980s and ended in the early 1990s; artists included the Beastie Boys and Public Enemy. Early hip-hop music was made without licensing the samples.
     
  • Musical borrowing has a long history, as musicians build on other’s work. Fusion of music from different sources is a part of African-American culture.
     
  • Many samples incorporate two types of musical copyright, the copyright in the musical composition, and the copyright in the sound recording. Revenues are claimed by composers, songwriters, musicians, record labels, publishers, and others.
     
  • Samplers won some early lawsuits when only a “de minimus” sample was taken. But then an influential case ruled that every sample must be licensed.
     
    • Musicians hesitate to rely on a “fair use” defense.
       
    • Today, the convention is for all samples to be licensed.
       
  • The licensing process is complex, slow, and costly, and may not succeed.
     
    • Many licenses cost $4000-$5000 per sample, but can cost up to $100,000.
       
    • Any stakeholder can veto the grant of a license.
       
  • Classic albums like “Fear of a Black Planet” could not be made today due to the expense of licenses; the musicians would lose about $7,000,000 on the project.
     
  • Copyright owners would oppose a statutory compulsory license for sampling; artists prefer to control the presentation of their own work.
     
  • Reforming and clarifying copyright law to restore the “de minimus” defense would be helpful.
     
  • Performing Rights Organizations could negotiate new licensing arrangements to streamline sample licensing, though copyright owners would prefer to retain control.
     
  • The use of “Creative Commons” licenses that allow copying under certain circumstances might help revive sampling.
     

 

Get The Article

Find the full article online

Search for Full Article

Share